Healing Combat Trauma

From the Canadian Side of the Street: A Military Author's Take on Veterans Suffering from War and PTSD

One of the many blessings of the new media -- social media like Facebook -- are the interesting, talented people one meets within that. One such person is Bonnie Toews, a Canadian former journalist and novelist with a longtime background in writing about the military. I forwarded her an article from the Montreal Gazette last week about social workers quitting because of burnout in Canada, meaning that fewer will be available to serve returning veterans with PTSD, and this is what she wrote on her website in response:

Outrageous failure of government assistance to returning Afghanistan vets

"It is wonderful that we celebrate the lives and courage of fallen soldiers when they are repatriated to CFB Trenton and paraded down the Highway of Heroes, but the question that is never answered: who looks out for the returning vets? Especially those whose minds, bodies and spirits have been shattered on a continual rotation of tours through the past eight years.

It is disgusting and absolutely unacceptable to hear that Canada's Veterans Affairs is cutting back on social workers because WWI and WWII vets are dying off. 

Excuse me, but Canada has a whole new generation of vets who have served in Afghanistan for eight years. By next year it will be nine years. The war in Afghanistan has lasted longer than either world war in the 20th Century and soldiers have been repeatedly rotated through three and four tours because our forces aren't large enough to handle a deployment this long and this demanding. These vets and their families need help to mend their lives back together. 

Kevin Dougherty in Montreal's newspaper, The Gazette, writes that soldiers suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder can wait up to four months before seeing a social worker, a necessary step to integrate them back into society and return them to the labor market. 

Why? Because federal social workers each have a caseload of 40 clients to their provincial counterparts, who carry a caseload of 20 clients each. There are not enough social workers to contend with the need, and under such strained resources, these caregivers burn out, depleting veterans' social services even further. 

People forget that soldiers returning home are not the only victims of the wars they've fought. So are their loved ones, families and friends. They need as much social assistance as the soldiers themselves. Those coming home are forever changed. They have experienced things the rest of us can't imagine. They carry this psychological burden for the rest of their lives. 

In 1994, in Rwanda, I was briefly introduced to that world of theirs. I was one of the few North American journalists covering the massive humanitarian effort following the genocide against the Tutsis and moderate Hutus in Rwanda. One peacekeeper after another told me what they saw, incomprehensible mass slaughter with no human respect whatsoever and they were forced to observe because the UN didn't give them the mandate or size of force to quell the madness. Soldiers trained to fight and defend forced to stand down. Can you imagine the helpless rage they experienced? Yet, when I came home, I faced the same apathy from friends, co-workers and the public as they did. My husband proudly explained that I had been in Rwanda and time and time again I was asked, "Did you go there on holiday?" 

People didn't even know what was going on, and were indifferent when I chose to explain. I, like so many soldiers, learned not to talk about it because no one really cared to listen. 

This time the public must get behind their vets and demand the social services they deserve and need. This is the most important tribute we can give our returning vets for the sacrifices they've made on behalf of our country."

 -- Bonnie Toews. A longtime journalist reporting for logistics and private security magazines and now a novelist, speaks out for the victims of genocide and war, from the peacekeepers and coalition forces trying to save suppressed peoples to the children and innocent civilians caught in the crossfire of opposing powers, ideologies and cultures. Current writing "Trilogy in Treason." Member of Military Writers Society of America, American Authors Association and ACFW. Her website is linked here.

Editor's note: Find us on Facebook, here; follow us on Twitter @HealingPTSD.

Veterans, PTSD and Suicide: The Overlooked Element of Contagion

This is an article I'd first started writing two years ago now. I did the research, and located the main, most often-cited study's principal investigator, long since retired, and asked him to confirm whether the trend is still true, though he first published it back in the 1970s. He affirmed that it was. What it is is an important and often-overlooked "connection" that will make more sense when we start describing it. It also fits into the category of things where the information is out there, but for some reason is also strangely ignored. Another instance was a few years ago, when the military kept saying, "We don't know what PTSD is tied to"; essentially, "we have no idea." Yet at the time, and this goes back several years now, I was able to read through the existing literature and learn, PTSD is tied to combat exposure. In other words, the more combat, the greater the chances of developing PTSD. And I wrote about it, here, at the time the military was saying, in essence, we don't know what it's linked to.

So it isn't that that wasn't known...it's that no one was paying attention to what was out there. (And these days, several  years later, they ARE admitting publicly that more exposure = greater chance of developing PTSD. But it does make me laugh a little bit to hear that now, thinking, we were talking about it here well before that was being said publicly. And not because of some strange prophetic abilities on our part; just from reading the available literature, and drawing what seemed like obvious conclusions.)

There's the old saying that "those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it." Well, much of what's known about PTSD has been known for decades now, with another fair part of the knowledge base has been increasing exponentially. I read an article the other day about a Harvard-trained psychiatrist who worked at the V.A. in Boston during the Vietnam war, and was "shocked" to learn that there wasn't a single book on war trauma in the library there. Today, one would hope, that situation has changed quite a bit. 

But to the point at hand...

As I read through my Twitter feed today (you can follow us @HealingPTSD on Twitter), I noticed several suicides being Tweeted by various sources. One was that of Mel Turpin, a former All-American basketball player and NBA star, dead at 49; and then the troubling news, especially to us in the veterans community, of a Marine Corps veteran, James F. Popkowski, 37, who apparently died in a "suicide-by-cop" or armed confrontation outside the V.A. in Bangor, Maine. (See those stories linked here and here, as well as a longer quasi-obituary of Popkowski, here.) At first the headline said only "an armed man" had died in a confrontation with police near a local VA -- and as soon as I read that, I hoped -- but yet somehow knew -- that it would be a veteran, with a painful story of his own. Later the news matured to show that in fact he was a veteran, who was struggling with this illness (cancer) and its treatment. But the fact he was a veteran and committed suicide reminded me instantly of the news from the last few days, where the Seattle Times did such a good job covering the suicide of a veteran with PTSD from Whidbey Island, Orrin McClellan. (I wrote about Orrin's life and death here and here.) So many suicides in the media, and superstitious types tend to think those run in threes -- though technically McClellan's death was in mid-May, with the coverage of it in the media happening over the last few days.

I need to branch off in two different directions here, to cover this material. 

One is to talk about the V.A. suicide's statements about his own condition, because veterans with PTSD and their family members may recognize their own veterans in those words. And the other is to introduce something very different, which is the effect that media coverage of suicides has on "successful" suicide attempts by others during the same general news cycle, especially young men (who are, after all, the majority of those who serve.) 

On that second point, as the military has generally speaking tried and failed to lower the suicide rate lately, I haven't seen much recognition (OK, any) of the idea that suicides are to some degree contagious. There's quite a bit of medical literature on the subject...and it's been documented in studies around the world, starting in the 1970s, that suicides reported in the news will have a demonstrated effect on increasing suicide attempts from specific populations who hear the news. Since suicide is a broad category -- many single-car or single-motorcycle accidents are also suicides -- and the military attempts periodically to crack down on motorcycle safety, etc., it would also be wise to enlarge the conversation to not only what other methods qualify as suicides, but also to take a look at how one suicide making the news can, depending on how it's portrayed, have an effect on increasing the number of other suicides that take place in the same general time frame, especially among those prone to committing suicide, because of depression and other factors. And we haven't even mentioned yet here the effect that some prescribed pharmaceutical medications can have on increasing suicidal thoughts.

(While it's somewhat unlikely that Popkowski, in Maine, was reading the Seattle Times' coverage of Orrin McClellan's death -- one, we never know; and two, in the age of the Internet, geographical barriers have disappeared and the news is instantaneous -- especially if you include other social media, like Facebook and Twitter, which can serve as additional sources of the same news. We're so much more wired now than when these studies first started being done, so we can't assume Popkowski didn't read the Seattle Times coverage, even though it's most likely that he didn't. For the sake of this argument -- because if it didn't happen with this case, it surely does with others, let's pretend that Popkowski did spend some time over the last few days reading the coverage of McClellan's suicide on the Internet.)

There's enough material to cover here that I need to go as far as I can with it now and then circle back around to it again soon. We'll introduce the science (below) but also cover what Popkowski said about his failing health, because his words will resonate with other veterans, who struggle not with cancer but with PTSD.

According to the article in the Portland, Maine Press Herald today, Popkowski, who had undergone a stem cell transplant for his cancer back in 2003 at the National Institutes of Health, struggled valiantly with the effects of the cancer and its treatment (both difficult), as well as sleep problems, depression and the like. In a letter to the editor of the magazine "New Scientist" back in 2008 he wrote,

"Suicide is like a little devil, always on my shoulder and always tempting me. Concern for the care of my three dogs after I am gone, my dogs being the only things I feel anything resembling passion for, is the only thing I think that has kept me from pulling the trigger on the loaded pistol, which rests next to my pillow."

He continued,

"The best way to describe the mental and emotional issue is that I am numb and passionless. Nothing brings joy or pleasure. I graduated magna cum laude with a (Bachelor of Science degree) in computer info systems and business management in just three years. Now, I cannot mentally focus enough to read a newspaper."

He added,

"I have lost count of the number of sleep aids NIH and my local VA have tried. Like the anti-depressants, none have worked."

And he described leaving his bunker, in terms that a veteran with PTSD would understand, only for brief forays out to re-provision with groceries and return, if his health even allowed him that. He wrote:

"For weeks at a time I will only leave my house once, and only briefly at night, to buy groceries and other supplies. Most of the time, the only time I drag myself into the shower, is when I have to go into town to buy groceries."

---

Now, we hope that no veteran ever crosses the bridge to suicide in his or her lifetime, and especially is not discouraged enough reading news of how another distressed veteran felt to contemplate it. Please use the resources at your disposal, including hotlines, buddies, and compassionate others as lifelines to not give up hope, because there IS hope, and you can get better. But for the rest of us, we need to keep pushing on with this narrative because there's something to learn here, including for decisionmakers who wonder about how better to educate about suicide prevention. This is where the element about the notoriety/publicity level of a suicide influences other at-risk populations.

To the science on this.

• Back in 1977, in the journal Science, DP Philips showed that "motor vehicle fatalities" (including "suicides by motor vehicle") increase in the time frame "just after publicized suicide stories." From the abstract: "The average increase in motor vehicle fatalities is 9.12 percent in the week after a suicide story. The more publicity given to the story, the greater the rise in motor vehicle deaths thereafter. This rise apparently occurs because suicide stories stimulate a wave of imitative suicides, some of which are disguised as motor vehicle accidents."
• In 2006, an Australian journal, Social Science Medicine, published a similar study, further demonstrating the "relationship between media reporting of suicide and actual suicide." They studied data on "4,635 suicide-related items appearing in Australian newspapers and on radio and television news and current affairs shows between March 2000 and February 2001. The study found that 39% of media items were followed by an increase in male suicides, and 31% by an increase in female suicides. Media items were more likely to be associated with increases in both male and female suicides if they occurred in the context of multiple other reports on suicide (versus occurring in isolation), if they were broadcast on television (versus other media), and if they were about completed suicide (versus attempted suicide or suicidal ideation). Different item content appeared to be influential for males and females, with an increase in male suicides being associated with items about an individual's experience of suicide and opinion pieces, and an increase in female suicides being associated with items about mass- or murder-suicide." They concluded, "Further research on this topic is required, but in the meantime there is a need to remain vigilant about how suicide news is reported. Mental health professionals and suicide experts should collaborate with media professionals to try to balance 'public interest' against the risk of harm."
  
• Versions of the original study were repeated over and over in the intervening years, and 30 years later, in 2007, the International Journal of Epidemiology published a study which showed "the influence of media reporting of the suicide of a celebrity on suicide rates," where a male television celebrity in Taiwan committed suicide, followed by a wave of somewhat "copy-cat" suicides among young men. (The "celebrity" element may initially confuse, but think of it this way -- it's a well-publicized suicide when it happens, which means it reaches most of the target audience. It also happens, according to other studies, when non-celebrities commit suicide. The distinguishing factor is how well publicized the suicide is/how much media attention or coverage is given to it. The more coverage, the more people know about it, including those in somewhat fragile populations.) Back to the study's results: "After controlling for seasonal variation, calendar year, temperature, humidity and unemployment rate, there was a marked increase in the number of suicides during the 4-week period after media reporting (relative risk = 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31). The increase was in men (relative risk = 1.30, 95% CI 1.14-1.50) and for the individuals using the same highly lethal method (hanging) as the TV  actor did (relative risk = 1.51, 95% CI 1.25-1.83). However, the age groups in which the increase occurred were younger than the age of the celebrity. CONCLUSIONS: The extensive media reporting of the celebrity suicide was followed by an increase in suicides with a strong implication of a modelling effect. The results provide further support for the need for more restrained reporting of suicides as part of suicide prevention strategies to decrease the imitation effect."
• Also in 2007, a study was conducted in Taiwan around the fact pattern of the same television celebrity's suicide and published in the Journal of Affective Disorders. It attempted to define the "influence of media reporting of a celebrity suicide on suicidal behavior in patients with a history of depressive disorder," and what it found was "Among 438 depressive patients exposed to the media report, 38.8% reported an influence on subsequent suicidal behaviors, including 24 (5.5%) with a suicide attempt. The risk of such influence was highest among patients in a severe depressive state just prior to the media report (adjusted OR 7.81, 95% CI 3.28-18.59). Such influence on a subsequent suicide attempt was highest in patients with a most recent suicide attempt within one month prior to the media reports (adjusted hazard ratio 11.91, 95% CI 3.76-37.72)." The authors concluded, "This study has provided more convincing evidence suggesting negative influences of media reporting of a celebrity suicide on subsequent suicidal behaviors among depressive patients. Particular attention in terms of potential negative media influences should be paid to patients who are younger and currently depressed and have made a recent suicide attempt."
• This year (2010), another Taiwanese study took a look at suicide rates after media reporting of another celebrity suicide, this time a female singing star. Their premise was that "Suicide attempters are known to be vulnerable to the influence of media reporting of suicide events. This study investigates possible influences of media reporting of a celebrity suicide on subsequent suicide attempts and associated risk factors among suicide attempters." In their study, "Sixty-three suicide attempters registered in a surveillance system of Taipei City Suicide Prevention Center were assessed using a structured interview soon after media reporting of the suicide of a young female singing star." Their results? "Forty-three (68%) respondents had encountered with the suicide news. Among them, 37% reported being influenced by the media reporting on their subsequent suicide attempts." Most hard-hit by the news? "Men (adjusted OR 6.36, 95% CI 1.29-31.44) and younger age groups (adjusted OR 4.93, 95% CI 1.04-23.45) were more susceptible to the media reporting." And the authors concluded, "This study has provided further evidence for suicide imitation among vulnerable people encountered with media reporting of celebrity suicide, and for the need to actively restrain reporting of suicides to decrease the imitation effect."

It's also true that young men -- the dominant demographic of who the all-volunteer military is these days, though approximately 11% are women -- are more prone to suicide than other age groups. Back to the science:

• According to statistics from a fact sheet on youth and violence provided by the CDC, "In 2005, 17% of high school students seriously considered attempting suicide, and 13% made a plan about how they would attempt suicide during the 12 months preceding the survey." (The reference cited is CDC. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2005.  Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2006; 55 (SS-5): 1-112.)
• Similarly, according to the CDC, "approximately 14% of all deaths among children and adolescents aged 5-19 years result from suicides."  The numbers climb according to age ranges, with younger children having the fewest, and older children the most.  Suicided ages 10-14: 283.  Suicides ages 15-19: 1,700.  (The reference cited is CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Office of Statistics and Programming. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Online at http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/. Accessed September 6, 2007.)

There's more that we could talk about here -- responsible reporting guidelines about suicide, when disseminated and implemented, seem to have the effect of reducing the number of copycat suicide attempts after a successful publicized suicide (a study in Austria shows that) -- but the intended effect here, which we can elaborate on in future posts, is to introduce the idea that one publicized suicide by, say, a veteran, can also most likely encourage an increased number of suicide attempts, some of them successful, by members of at-risk populations, such as young/depressed/men. Do any of those words correlate with anyone who might be suffering from PTSD, or taking medications that might also increase suicidal thoughts? And we haven't even added into the mix the effects of alcohol, which many PTSD sufferers self-medicate with, and how that would affect suicidal thinking. There's much, much, much more to talk about on this topic -- not just here on this site but nationally -- but we hope this dense, rather convoluted post has at least gotten you thinking about not so much that we need to protect veterans with PTSD from seeing or reading the news, which might contain an item about another veteran's suicide -- but that suicides can almost go in waves (read the literature on prison populations, etc. for this), where one suicide spurs others in the same population -- because publicity surrounding a suicide has the unintended consequence of increasing suicidal tendencies in other affected people. Since many, many veterans with PTSD are to a degree on edge already...it might be good to realize the effect that reading about another veteran's demise could have on an already depressed, stressed or demoralized individual.

And since the larger goal for all of should be preventing suicides among PTSD-injured veterans, it's highly worth having this conversation.

The Healing Space between Inspiration and Destruction

As the last quote I'd like to introduce from Robert Johson, the Jungian analyst, for now, it's a passage about a type of altar seen among "primitive" peoples in Peru, who often carry this altar with them, the better to address spirituality wherever they are. I've made a botch-up of the illustration, because I wasn't able to find a "perfect" representation of the mesa, so it's a combination of several that I saw. Here is Johnson's quote. Once again, it's part of the ongoing "conversation" we're having, about whether one side has to "win out" in our natures in order to heal. Johnson and the curanderos of South America would seem to say, "no." Healing is what takes place in the space between...

 "A particularly powerful form of (overlap between darkness and light, or the self and its shadow side) can be seen in the customs of South American curanderos, who are a curious mixture of primitive shaman and Catholic priest. Their mesa (table) is an altar where they say Mass for the healing of their patients. They divide this altar into three distinct sections. The right is made up of inspiring elements such as a statue of a saint, a flower, a magic talisman; the left contains very dark and forbidding elements such as weapons, knives or other instruments of destruction. The space between these two opposing elements is a place of healing. The message is unmistakable: our own healing proceeds from that overlap of what we call good and evil, light and dark. It is not that the light element alone does the healing; the place where light and dark begin to touch is where miracles arise." -- Robert A. Johnson, Jungian analyst, author of "Owning Your Own Shadow: Understanding the Dark Side of the Psyche."

For more on the topic of the "Tao of Healing," click here. It's a selection of quotes that represents the ongoing, organic process that we undergo whenever we want to get well.

Editor's note: For more on the curanderos and their mesas, click here or here.

Quotable Quotes -- World War I British Doctor on Humane Treatment for PTSD

" Do not send your cases down the line ... when you get these emotional cases, unless they are very bad ... give him a rest at the aid post if necessary and a day or two’s sleep, go up with him to the front line, and, when there, see him often, sit down beside him and talk to him about the war or look through his periscope and let the man see you are taking an interest in him, [and] you will not have nearly so many cases of anxiety neurosis." -- Col. J. S. Y. Rogers, 4/Black Watch, Report of the War Office Committee of Enquiry into 'Shell-Shock’ (London, HMSO, 1922), 64. Quoted in "'Pitiless psychology': the role of prevention in British military psychiatry in the second world war," by Ben Shepard, published in The History of Psychiatry, 1999; 10; 491, linked in full here.

Violence at Camp Liberty: Shocked, Maybe, but Not Surprised

 Allow a little venting of spleen here: The violence at Camp Liberty today in Iraq, where an American active duty servicemember allegedly opened fire on others at the stress clinic, a location where other servicemembers go for counseling, killing 5 at 2:00 p.m. local time -- if we're shocked that this happened, that's okay; but seriously, America-- why are we still "surprised"?!

Here's 10 reasons NOT to be surprised, though feel free to continue to be shocked:

1.    Tours are too long, putting considerable and unprecedented strain on the all-volunteer military. The AP reports, "The U.S. military is coping with a growing number of stress cases among soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan - many of whom are on their third or fourth combat tours. Some studies suggest that about 15 percent of soldiers returning from Iraq suffer from some sort of emotional problems." The ones who initially deployed?  Strong and willing.  But as the tours wore on, how many stayed that way?  Certainly not everybody.
2.    Resources for stress management are inadequate, and there's often peer pressure not to make use or take advantage of them -- and then the broader question: what are we really offering to help soldiers heal?  Is there anything in the conventional medical world that's actually working? There's talk therapy and there's medication, and those who follow this topic in-depth know that there are problems with either or both of those approaches.  Anecdotally, of the three combat veterans whose lives I follow most closely, all three of whom had recently pronounced substantial healing  -- two of the three who relied on the most conventional approaches -- were re-hospitalized within the past month for psychiatric reasons, each within several weeks of pronouncing how much better they were doing, thanks to their course of treatment.  (The third combat veteran, who follows a less conventional path, is actually truly doing better -- or so it would currently seem.) When it comes to combat-based PTSD, the "cure," such as it is -- is a long way off -- particularly if we only look along conventional channels.
3.    Access to firearms is...ummm...not an issue: they're everywhere.  It's war, and we're armed to the teeth.  It's part of what we do.  But carrying a weapon in a stress clinic?  Doesn't seem on the face of it to be a wise safety choice;
4.    Workplace violence is a fact of civilian life, too: OSHA reports that homicide is the fourth leading cause of workplace fatalities. On an average workday, according to one site, "three people will be murdered on the job in the U.S."  Annually, "one million workers are assaulted, and more than 1,000 are murdered." Concerns are that half these cases go unreported, so the figures might even be doubled. Mondays, in fact -- today  when the Camp Liberty incident took place is a Monday, after all -- are a prime time for incidents to take place.  Something about people stewing about their real or imaginary mistreatment over the weekend, and coming back in and deciding to "do something about it."  Read the cases: Monday is often when disgruntled American workers, at the very least, choose to settle the score;
5.    Sleep deprivation is a chronic problem in the over-extended military.  As a technique for inducing symptoms along the spectrum from abject misery to forms of psychosis, it's effective enough that it's used (by the U.S.) as a form of torture, like waterboarding. Going without sleep, which the military chronically does, puts soldiers at risk on a regular basis.  Not that there are any easy answers to this, but that needs to be taken into account. Not sleeping is very dangerous to your health: and if to yours, by extension to those around you, too. Experts like veterans advocate Jonathan Shay, M.D., Ph.D. have long warned about the dangers of exhaustion and sleep-deprivation.  It's time to pay greater attention;
6.    Talking heads and pundits attempt to minimize the problem by saying, it's only the fifth case of soldiers killing one another since the war began but REALLY -- are they serious?!  How about adding the qualifier, "known" case -- as in, proven.  (Even the New York Times said, more accurately, "The killing of American troops by their fellow soldiers is infrequent, but not unheard of.") Think of the many cases of noncombat deaths in Iraq.  How many of these, because of insufficient, inadequate, or misguided investigations -- or cover-ups -- might turn out to be soldier upon soldier violence, if we but knew the facts? A percentage of the noncombat deaths are murders, not just accidents or suicide.
7.    Felony waivers. While many -- or most -- of the military may be fine and upstanding individuals -- better, in fact, than most of their less patriotric, more self-centered peers -- the reality is, as the war continues, an increasing few who have less savory backgrounds or mental states are being given waivers and allowed to join anyway -- then deployed with the rest of the troops, and put under the same types of strain, which perhaps they don't bear very well -- or as well as their peers;
8.    If recruiter suicides are up (and they are) -- recruiters being in a good position to know the true costs of going to war on the troops -- and suicide is effectively giving up on their being a solution to one's problems -- shouldn't  this ring some greater warning bell than it has, that perhaps we're asking people to do and to sacrifice, far beyond their actual ability to?
9.    We can't discount the fact that some people are just unbalanced -- and some of the ones who are, unavoidably, also serve in the military.  The last well-publicized statistic on the subject was that roughly 10% of the (overall) population suffers from mental illness. Some of these people are in the military, and under stresses and strains greater than most of us have ever endured, some will snap.  that in itself should not really...surprise us.  It's not a diss against the military: it's a fact of life. If anything their challenges are stronger than anyone else's.
10.  Interpersonal violence and suicide are both extreme versions of "lashing out" at what's perceived to be an unjust fate.  Domestic violence rates in the military ARE worthy of some "shock 'n awe" of their own.  During the same news cycle, where the Camp Liberty incident is being broadcast across all possible news outlets, other, equally horrendous incidents are also happening among servicemembers and veterans -- horrendous to the victims and their families, as well as to the families of those who commit the crimes. Here's an example of the same from today's news cycle, though it's all been pushed off the page by the greater prominence of the Baghdad story. The Colorado Springs Gazette reports that Thomas Woolly, 24, was arrested in the shooting death of a 19-year-old woman.  As the Gazette describes, "Woolly ... was a heavy machine gunner in the 4th Infantry Division's 2nd Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment.  Members of the 500-soldier unit, nicknamed the Lethal Warriors, have been involved in stabbings, beatings, brawls, domestic violence, shootings, at least two attempted murders and four homicides in Colorado Springs. Another soldier who served with the unit in Iraq has been accused of murder in California. The unit has also been plagued by drug abuse and suicide..."

By bringing this up -- that this violence might be "shocking," but surely shouldn't be "surprising" -- it isn't intended to single out servicemembers or veterans as "bad" -- if anything, they're under abnormally large stressors.  It is to say, this stuff happens -- not always as well broadcast as when it happens in a group.  But it happens all the same. Forgetting even Iraq and Afghanistan for the moment -- across AMERICA -- do we honestly believe that fewer than five people -- including the servicemembers and veterans involved -- had their lives in actual, mortal danger from incidents like this? (In the Woolly incident above, for example, one woman was killed, but another one was injured, according to published reports.)

Again, if we were but able to "see" across the broad expanse of all the people this affects, and into all their homes and lives, even on one given day, I think we might be quite surprised to see the continuing emotional toll and strain that combat stress and its aftermath produces. Continuing to look at incidents like whatever happened at Camp Liberty today -- as the facts continue to come out, over time -- as "isolated" incidents, instead of a very visible part of the mostly in-visible spectrum of pain and suffering -- only allows us to stay in the dark on this topic a little longer than we should. 

For the health of servicemembers, veterans and their families, it's time to start admitting what a difficult problem we have: and one that takes more than lip service, and conventional modes of treatment, to "handle" and ultimately to "solve."

The Poetry of War: This Time, from Afghanistan

The BBC has an article today called "Afghan Poets Tackle Scars of War," linked here.

The article writes, regarding the effect the war has had on the national literature:

"This theme of violence is playing out in other genres in ...[Afghanistan], such as short stories. But it is more visible in poetry.

"It is not the poets' choice to write about war and violence, they are compelled to do so - to express their reaction and hatred to bloodshed," says Darwesh Durrani, a popular [Afghan] poet and professor of literature in Quetta."

Additionally, 

"Poets are inspired by what is happening in the outside world. Their imagination absorbs it," says veteran [Afghan] poet in Peshawar, Rahmat Shah Sael.

"That is why [Afghan] poets are writing about violence in one way or another."

One of the poems in the article is evocative of the violence and grief Afghans are experiencing.  The lines are from Zarlasht Hafeez, "a female Pashto poet who has published a collection called 'Waiting for Peace'." Her lines read:

"The sorrow and grief, these black evenings,

Eyes full of tears and times full of sadness,

These burnt hearts, the killing of youths,

These unfulfilled expectations and unmet hopes of brides,

With a hatred for war, I call time and again,

I wait for peace for the grief-stricken [Afghans]."

It's unclear whether Afghan poets are publishing books of their poetry or reading individual poems aloud, according to local tradition.  However, the feelings about war, grief and loss that they're expressing through poetry are an essential communal reaction, and will take their place alongside similar expressions from others who have experienced the pain of war.  The right hand "sidebar" of this website includes a number of books of poetry, from this war and previous ones -- whether individual books of poetry, or anthologies of war poetry. For an index of material we've written on this blog about combat and poetry, click here.

Editor's note: The photograph, of an elderly man surrounded by villagers and Aghan National Army soldiers during search operation in rural Afghanistan, 2007, is by noted humanitarian photographer Zoriah.  Used with permission.  For more of Zoriah's work, click here. 

Suicide Predictors in Young Men -- Combat Trauma Not Included

We've talked on the blog before about "suicide maps" and various predictors of suicide, however imperfect they may be.  Today there's an item from a medical journal that details a Finnish study -- aka, a medical study performed in Finland -- which essentially says, adolescent boys and young men who committed suicide frequently also showed some form of psychiatric illness at age 8 -- which happened to be the age where they were first evaluated, in the study.  Young women who killed themselves, didn't show this particular trend. Now, not to say that this study is in any way conclusive about PTSD -- since obviously it didn't even touch on that as a topic -- but it is interesting, since some of the research indicates that PTSD can be particularly difficult if it is "laid on top of" a previous, significant traumatic experience (often in childhood). In some ways, this study may not be all that germane to our topic, but it's interesting to note, in any case, since there are obviously a number of young men (and women) who commit suicide in the armed forces, and as veterans -- and it's always worthwhile to comb the scientific literature for any other reasons, or contributing factors into, why this might actually be.  Here's the info from the study:

Childhood Psychiatric Problems May Predict Suicide Attempts in Males

Most males who commit suicide or need hospital care for suicide attempts during their teen or early adult years appear to have high levels of psychiatric problems at the age of 8, according to a report in the Archives of General Psychiatry. However, later suicide attempts in females are not predicted by mental health issues at this age.
 
Andre Sourander, MD, of Turku University Hospital in Finland, and colleagues studied 5,302 Finnish individuals born in 1981. Eight years later, information about psychiatric conditions, school performance, and family demographics was gathered from children, parents, and teachers. Participants were then tracked through national registers through 2005.
 
Between the ages of 8 and 24, 40 participants died, including 24 males and 16 females. Of those, 13 males and two females died from suicide. A total of 54 males and females (1%) either completed suicide or made a suicide attempt serious enough to result in hospitalization.
 
Of the 27 males who either seriously attempted or completed suicide, 78% screened positive for psychiatric conditions at the age of 8, compared with 11% of 27 females who had serious or completed suicide attempts. In addition, males who would go on to make life-threatening or completed suicide attempts were more likely at the age of 8 to live in a family that did not consist of two biological parents, have psychological problems as reported by a teacher or have conduct, hyperactive, or emotional problems. However, none of these factors at 8 predicted later suicidal behavior in females, and depression at age 8 was not associated with suicide attempts for either sex.
 
Previous research has shown that in females, suicide is associated with depression and other affective disorders, which increase sharply after the beginning of puberty. This may explain why childhood psychiatric conditions do not predict later suicidal behavior in girls, the authors noted.
 

— Source: American Medical Association

A Look in "The Mirror" -- Great Britain Seeing War Trauma Now in 3 Years, Not 13 As Before

Because Americans are notorious for paying little attention to things that happen elsewhere, even among other English language-speaking countries, here's some news from Great Britain's tabloid-esque "The Sunday Mirror" today about their soldiers' battles with PTSD on the homefront -- soldiers who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.  For the link to the article, called "War's Silent Victims," by Rupert Hamer, click here. (The tabloid nature of the newspaper explains the fairly breathless writing style, but let's hope the facts and the reporting are accurate nonetheless.)

Points worth mentioning from the article include:

"Alarmingly, the charity [Combat Stress, see below] say[s] the figures are just the "tip of the iceberg" and add that the rate at which soldiers are developing the condition has accelerated. Usually it takes 13 years for cases of post-traumatic stress disorder to develop in veterans.

But psychiatrists at Combat Stress's pioneering centre say the men and women now being treated have come forward after just THREE years.

Also:

Dr Walter Busuttil, a consultant psychiatrist at Combat Stress, said: "What we are seeing now is just the tip of the iceberg.

"Because there has been no proper study of post-traumatic stress disorder among troops in this country we have no idea of the true scale of the problem.

"The same thing happened in the US after Vietnam. The Government tried to dismiss the disorder as a myth - then the whole thing exploded. Now when I speak to my colleagues in America they tell me: 'You are going through your Vietnam'."

And finally:

Dr Busuttil, 49, a psychiatrist in the RAF for 16 years, says the Government has covered up the severity of the conflicts from the public.

"The worst thing for a serviceman or woman is to come back from a war and for people not to have any idea what they have been through.

Editor's note: For a link to Great Britain's charity, Combat Stress, click here.  To find them on Facebook, click here. We've written about them before on this blog, but according to their website, "Combat Stress is the leading charity specialising in the care of British Veterans who have been profoundly traumatised by harrowing experiences during their Service career and who are suffering from poor mental health as a result."

Study Shows Mind-Body Medicine Works on PTSD

(Just what we've been talking about, and who we've just been talking about as well.  Heh.  Love that.  So confirming...)

Read down and see how therapeutic this would be for people in rural communities, with little or no access to the VA, who are in therapy or not, for DIY types and those who prefer to access healthcare through a practitioner of one kind or another.  Just wonderful... and we knew it all along :-)

---

The Washington, DC based Center for Mind-Body Medicine (CMBM) announced today the publication of a landmark study on the use of its comprehensive, non-drug model to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in war traumatized children. The study, “Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Post-War Kosovar Adolescents Using Mind-Body Skills Groups: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” which was published today online in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) ever of any intervention with war traumatized children. It is also the first RCT of a successful, comprehensive mind-body approach with any traumatized population.

The study demonstrates that the Center’s groundbreaking model can be used to produce highly significant and lasting changes in levels of stress, flashbacks, nightmares, and symptoms of withdrawal and numbing in highly traumatized children – those who lived in an area of Kosovo where in 1999 90% of the homes were burned and bombed and 20% of the children lost one or both parents.

 The CMBM approach includes self-expression and mind-body techniques and was offered to these children over 12 sessions in an educational, supportive small group setting. Eighty-two high school students in Kosovo participated in the study. The program was conducted by teachers and included meditation, guided imagery, breathing techniques, and biofeedback as well as self-expression through words, drawings, and movement. All the students met the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which was measured using the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Following the program, the number of students having symptoms indicating PTSD was significantly reduced from 100% to 18%. The reduction in symptoms was maintained at a 3 month follow-up. The improvement in PTSD symptoms was significantly greater compared to a similar group of students who did not participate in the mind-body skills program. This is the same model that CMBM’s founder and director, James S. Gordon, M.D., describes in detail in his new book, Unstuck: Your Guide to the Seven Stage Journey Out of Depression.

“This RCT,” Dr. Gordon, the lead author, says, “is important because it provides scientific evidence for the efficacy of a model that has been taught to almost 3,000 health and mental health professionals and educators worldwide. We’ve used this small group model to give tens of thousands of children and adults practical tools that help them to feel better quickly, and we’ve taught them to use their intuition and imagination to solve problems that had seemed overwhelming. We help traumatized people around the world to draw on strengths they may have forgotten they have, and we offer them a ‘safe place’ in which they can share their pain with others who have suffered as they have.”

“This model is educational, non-stigmatizing, and powerfully effective. It can be easily taught and can be used by people of all ages on their own,” Dr. Gordon explains. “It’s highly acceptable to populations which do not want to be given medication, those with no access to a doctor or therapist, and those who are in psychotherapy.”

This model, which Dr. Gordon presents in a step-by-step self-help format in Unstuck, is currently being used by CMBM with war traumatized populations in Israel and Gaza as well as in post-Katrina southern Louisiana. It is widely used with anxious and depressed people and those with chronic illness in the US, and has already been incorporated as a stress reduction program for students in a dozen US medical schools.

The CMBM model is also of increasing interest to the US Department of Defense and the Veterans Administration. “The military,” Dr. Gordon says, “understands the breadth and depth of the psychological crisis (as many as 300,000 returning veterans are expected to have posttraumatic stress disorder or major depressive disorder, and another 320,000 will have been made vulnerable to these conditions by traumatic brain injury). The military’s leadership is committed to finding evidence-based approaches, like the one taught by The Center for Mind-Body Medicine, that can make a difference for the individual veteran and his/her family, an approach that can be taught to the large numbers of professionals and peer counselors who serve them.” More than 100 health and mental health professionals who work with the military are expected at the next CMBM training in mind-body medicine on October 25-29 in Minneapolis, and many more are expressing interest in learning and using the CMBM model.

For more information about the upcoming training, click here,  or to order Unstuck: Your Guide to the Seven-Stage Journey Out of Depression", please email The Center for Mind-Body Medicine (CMBM) at mindbody@cmbm.org or visit www.cmbm.org.

Find the Cost of Freedom, Buried in the Ground

It's an old Crosby, Stills & Nash song, by Steven Stills. Many of us who were there in the 70s still remember the words. I know I can recite them from memory: "Find the cost of freedom, buried in the ground. Mother Earth will swallow you; lay your burdens down."

Tomorrow is the Fourth of July.  Not only my favorite holiday the whole year through -- sorry, I'm a New Englander, we're just born that way -- but also another opportunity - along with Memorial Day, and Veterans Day - to stop and honor the service of those who sacrificed their lives for freedom, or at least, responded to what they saw as the call of duty that they responded to, while others did not. Those whose blood was shed on American soil -- in Lexington, Massachusetts, in the Revolutionary War -- and also, more recently, in the jungles of Vietnam, in the mountains of Afghanistan and in the sands and urban jungles of Iraq.

I'm thinking today about censorship -- and the power of an image to convey, in a single instance, what those of us who labor over our words perhaps never can.  The picture, they claim, is worth 1,000 words -- perhaps because it communicates, in an instant, across barriers of language, space and time -- what human beings instinctively understand, nonverbally.  With war: that there is a price; that it is never really glorious; that those who give their lives often do so -- as the poet W.H. Auden wrote about the famous art masterpiece, the "Fall of Icarus," by the Dutch painter, Brueghel -- in a depressingly inglorious context:

"About suffering they were never wrong,

The Old Masters; how well they understood

Its human position; how it takes place

While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along...

If you don't remember the Greek myth of Icarus you might need some refreshing.  He's the pre-Wright Brothers son of Daedalus, whose father built him a pair of wings, in order to take flight and escape from the island of Crete.  But the father glued the wing feathers in with wax, and then warned his son not to fly too close to the sun (probably without explaining actually why.)  Icarus partially succeeded in his goal -- he was able to fly, but in flying, did get too close to the sun -- at which point the sun's rays melted the wing feathers' wax and he literally dropped out of the sky, into the ocean -- having succeeded in his fabulous quest and also painfully failed, all at the same time.  That's not the parallel with the armed forces: the parallel worth drawing here is that sometimes death on a glorious "mission" turns out to be a most pedestrian thing, and the rest of us, unless we're apprised of it, don't even notice or celebrate.  On a deeper level, it brings up the question: as Americans, how exactly do we "support the troops," if we're not even really aware of what they're up against?

Unlike Vietnam, where grainy black and white news footage of U.S. soldiers fighting and dying in foreign jungles was often watched during dinner, with Walter Cronkite narrating -- in Iraq and Afghanistan, we're reduced to very little coverage and certainly not much that could "upset" our "overly tender sensibilities."  No flag-draped coffins being offloaded at Dover Air Force Base, instantly communicating that for every loss in combat there's a grieving, distraught family and a hole in the community, left by that veteran, that will never be filled.  Even those, like me, who don't exactly excel at math -- we're more than dimly aware that for every servicemember KIA -- or killed in action -- there are scores more wounded and disfigured for life -- emotionally scarred (invisibly) as well as visibly.  The human costs are staggering: those are daddies and mommies, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, employees and employers who come home different: maybe unable to work, maybe unable to function - initially or long-term; maybe unable to take care of their families while they struggle with their own wounds of war.  This is the human cost of war: it exists whether we are personally dialed in to it and aware of it, or not.  It is, to use the words of Hedley Peach, a "generic effect of combat."

And while the news media gives scant coverage to what is happening in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, as surely as the hands of our clock tick daily the minutes and the hours, somebody's sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, fathers, and mothers are dying, and being injured -- somewhere.  We can be for or against the wars -- forget that noise for now -- but at the very least, we ought to be for the veterans.  And their families.  If what happens is fully what they signed up for: so be it.  I'll say this for myself, if no one else: They're better people than I am.  If it's not what they bargained for: even more reason to feel compassion for what they're going through.  But here's a pretty elementary principle: if we don't see it, we can't grasp it -- and we move on with our lives as though nothing were really happening.  No coffins at Dover? No bodies on the news?  I guess this war isn't really costing that much in human terms after all...it's just another blip on our radar, hardly making a difference among the rest of the pronounced concerns of our lives and welfare.  Except that it IS happening -- and men and women are dying, and being injured, often grievously -- and we're, generally speaking, like the villagers in the Icarus poem, above (read the whole thing) pretty unaware of how that affects us, or if it even does.

And THAT is where journalism comes in, and photojournalism -- to convey in a single image, what dozens of column inches can barely touch.  A single image that resourcefully, potently conveys the reality of life and death on the knife edge, on the tip of the spear -- somewhere around the globe, and challenges you, me, us -- the viewer -- to say that it matters, and that we finally understand.

Maybe that's why in every craptastic Third World-ish revolution, they always kill -- um, that would be the military who does the killing -- the intelligentsia -- the artists, the poets, the thinkers, the intellectuals -- first.  Because I guess if you even goad the populace at large to think, why, you're a highly dangerous individual, and should be stopped -- before you can do any more harm (I mean, good.)

---

Want a riveting image, that "stops the presses," and conveys for all time the intrinsic truth -- or at least, one powerful truth -- about an experience?  Turn to a photojournalist.  I've read more words than I can think of in my time, but if you want to know what I remember -- it's the images, often Pulitzer Prize-winning, from the eras of our shared experience.  Vietnam? It's the naked young girl, covered in Napalm, running from her burning village.  (We dropped the Napalm, btw...) Famine in Africa?  It's the buzzard, waiting for the tiny dark baby with its protruding ribs to just "hurry up and die, wouldja?!" so the buzzard could eat it.  (The photographer who shot that amazing scene, and won a Pulitzer Prize for it, later killed himself -- perhaps because those who witness tremendous suffering, also suffer tremendously themselves.)

---

I'm not going to say who it is, because -- call me a fatalist -- I don't want to wake up tomorrow and find out that he's dead.  ESPECIALLY not on the Fourth of July -- that would be offensive in the extreme.  But the other day, some well-known and ridiculously good photojournalist blogrolled me -- stuck a link to this blog on his blog -- and I checked it out, to see what his stuff was like -- and of course it was riveting.  He's an embedded photojournalist in Iraq, or was, I should say, until the Marine brass apparently got fed up with him, and summarily pulled him out of his embedded assignment and out of the country.  His only offense, from the sounds of things?  Shooting the aftermath of a suicide blast in Ramadi -- you know, the Anbar province -- the Sunni triangle -- the previous hotbed of violence in Iraq -- which if we're to read the mainstream media, why, all that has calmed down considerably from a few years ago, and there's hardly anything brewing there at all.  Well, except for the lives of scores of people who died there, INCLUDING MARINES, in a suicide bombing just last week.  This guy documented it -- as sensitively as one could, given the horrific nature of the scene -- and he expressed the emotional toll it was taking on him, as no other experience had.  And somebody in the Marine Corps upper echelons took offense at what the rest of us call -- oh, I don't know -- the First Amendment -- and took steps to pull him out of there, on the double.

Let's HOPE the guy lives long enough to evacuate safely.  Really.  And then let's hope he still gets to show what he shot, at great personal cost -- because some of the rest of us (it's a refresher course: we're called Americans) want to actually SEE the cost of freedom -- in a way that those of us who don't serve, don't know; and those of us who do, and did -- know only too well.  It's only fair.  If we sanitize the living daylights out of these wars -- for what? -- not only will the American public not "get" the tremendous price paid by those serving AND their families; they won't be as compassionate to the same people afterwards as they need to be.  It's in all of our best interests to actively fight for, and preserve, the freedom of the press.  And that means photojournalists, who document war's horror, sufferings, and triumphs in a way no print journalist could ever begin to approximate.

---

For my part, when I saw the photos in question the other day, I had myself a good, therapeutic, and instantaneous cry -- not just for the crumpled bodies of THOSE Marines on the ground -- he was subtle, nuanced and concerned enough not to show their faces, or anything else that identified them -- but for all the others I knew and knew about, who'd fought, been injured, or died there -- or returned home, not quite as intact, in body or soul, as when they'd left.  To deny us, as Americans, the chance through images like this to share the plight of those who are fighting on our behalf elsewhere in the world, is to deny us the chance to share what servicemembers are going through; and to deny them the chance to know that somewhere out there are people who "get," admire and respect the tremendous price they've paid through their service.

---

The Marine Corps, which wants to sign more patriotic young sons and daughters up to fight, apparently thinks that by constraining the version of what reality is to just a portion of the whole will keep them happy and us in the dark, and people like this brave guy, the photographer, well, in complete limbo.  Little do they know that the patriots will still fight, but the rest of us could use an education course in compassion, sensitivity and yes, tenderness for those who've fought in battle, that only comes through expanding our horizons, and by facing the whole truth of what they're really going through, as combatants. Don't sugar coat the truth: everyone who goes to war comes back changed -- that's just how it is.  Let's develop a compassion and an understanding for what they go through, not sweep it under the rug.  The death and injury of those with whom they serve is often the most scarring aspect of combat there is.  Just ask those who've never been the same since.

So especially on this Fourth of July, as one extraordinarily talented photojournalist sits in limbo, let's hope still alive, ripped out of the fight for no other reason than that he was getting a little too close to home in showing us what war is really like -- I'm appalled to think that as Americans, we're not being trusted with the whole truth, when it's expressly the whole truth that we need, as Martin Luther King once said, to set us free.  We need to know the human costs of these battles we're in.  And suppressing the images of that just harms our servicemembers and their families, and cripples the compassion of us as a people.

---

Until I looked it up just now, I didn't realize that Crosby, Stills and Nash song had other lyrics.  Apparently it does.  Besides the chorus (above), which I remember so well, there's another verse as well:

Daylight again, following me to bed
I think about a hundred years ago, how my fathers bled
I think I see a valley, covered with bones in blue
All the brave soldiers that cannot get older been askin' after you
Hear the past a callin', from Armegeddon's side
When everyone's talkin' and no one is listenin', how can we
decide?

On the behalf of all those "brave soldiers that cannot get older," could we at least not suppress and crush the efforts of those who are trying to get us to see the whole truth?  What truth is that, you may ask?  The very cost of freedom, buried in the ground -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and in Vietnam beforehand. Godspeed, Z.  You are a witness on ALL of our behalf, to the price that war really exacts, on those who serve in it.