Healing Combat Trauma

From a Combat Veteran Himself: A Suggested Guide for PTSD Veteran Charged with a Crime

The other day, we published, with the author's permission, Scott Lee's thoughts as a combat veteran and student of social work, on dissociative PTSD, criminality and the combat veteran.  Today we publish, also with his permission, the guide he wrote for combat veterans and their familiies, when a combat veteran with PTSD has run afoul of the law.  Scott isn't a lawyer, so this isn't legal advice.  But it is wise, compassionate, fellow veteran and fellow PTSD sufferer type advice.  Keep it handy to refer to; it's really, really good.  You can also look through the archives here for things previously written about legal issues and combat trauma.  (See topics like "legal issues," "legal justice," and "crime and punishment.")  Fortunately, in the several years since we started this blog -- at which point there were literally none -- some resources have sprung up in the legal community for helping combat veterans with PTSD to get legal advice for their situations.  There's also a good video by the Norfolk County, Massachusetts' DA's office, which we've blogged about earlier, here, that gives a good overview of the challenges returning veterans face in their communities, including with law enforcement.

 

 

Suggested Guide to Help Your Veteran or Soldier Diagnosed with PTSD, and Charged with a Crime

To whom it may concern,

I would suggest that you start researching about PTSD right away. The mind-body connection and interactions, the psychology of PTSD, defensive mechanisms, how the mind responds to trauma, the symptoms of PTSD, how extended combat (such as multiple tours served) effects soldiers and veterans, legal ramifications of criminal behavior and PTSD, the processes of the psychic split from reality and past combat experiences, how anxiety plays an everyday part of our lives, how ordinary stress can lead to higher levels of stress and extreme responses and flashbacks, the nature of flashbacks, the nature of triggers and how they apply to PTSD, and the mental compartmentalization that happens to a PTSD survivor. This is by no means a comprehensive list, but should give you some kind of idea of where you might want to start.

 

Like it or not, this has consumed your life by no choice of your own, instead of letting that energy overwhelm you and feeling helpless, turn that energy into a useful endeavor and focus it toward finding out as much as possible about PTSD and the effects of combat. You have more passion about this subject than anyone, use this as an opportunity to help your loved one get a fair trial and to force the courts to consider his/her mental illness as a contributing factor in their actions.

 

Do not take no for an answer from his/her lawyer as to your wanting to get involved in your significant others case, jump into his/her pocket and become the "paralegal" and find them the information that needed for fair consideration of the case. Most lawyers will resist this from you, again do not take no for an answer. I am guessing that the lawyer will probably be a public defender; they are overloaded with cases and cannot really give the appropriate attention that their caseload needs. So, you need to assume that role of "defender" and information detective, this can greatly impact the outcome of the trial.

Consider trying to find a high profile lawyer who will take the case on pro bono; this type of case has become a hot topic in the news and media. A lawyer might take a case for this reason and could benefit the outcome. Go to the clerk’s office and get a copy of the court case file, this will help you by becoming familiar with the states perspective on the case and what exactly is being done. Educate yourself in Miranda rights (If they violated his rights here, this could have a considerable impact on the outcome), federal constitutional law concerning 1st, 4th (emphasis here), 5th, 6th and 8th amendments, along with state constitutional law. Educate yourself on how the court works, the proceedings, when and where evidence can be brought, the questioning of witnesses and how that process is different in every aspect of the trial.

Educate yourself on case law concerning PTSD and other mental illnesses where a consideration or precedent has been set, this can be used in your case and can greatly influence what happens. Look into your state laws first as they will have the most sway, because state law guides state cases first, then look to federal law to find precedents and findings where PTSD was considered in the sentencing phase. Concentrate on first on the main trial part where the evidence and witnesses will be displayed then on the sentencing. Both of these parts of the overall court proceedings will be the most important part, your soldier or veteran’s fate will be decided between these two proceedings.

 

Educate yourself on and things to do:  

• Do not talk with the police or anyone else until you have talked with your lawyer, what you say will be used against you

• learn your rights and assert them, you do not have any rights if you do not know your rights

• get a copy of court case file

• get a copy of VA file and military file

• jump in your lawyers pocket

• try to find a pro bono lawyer

• individual rights, Miranda and if they were violated

• legal proceedings, structure of court formalities and rules of law

• psychology of PTSD

• case law, state and federal, concentrating on the main trial and sentencing process

• constitutional law

• legal responsibilities of the judge, your lawyer and the prosecutor

• find a support group

• contact your senator, congressperson

• contact your local VFW, AMVETS, or veterans associations

 

I know that this seems like too much, just figure out what is coming next and then concentrate your efforts into that. Take one court proceeding at a time and concentrate on the legalities of that part of the process and use it as a guide to where you need to research and what you should do. The structure of the next proceedings will be your sign post for the direction you need to concentrate on. You can do this, if you accept that you have been put on this earth for this.

 

You were born to do this; this may be your purpose in life, to be the freedom fighter for all veterans and soldiers who will face similar tribulations. You have more vested in this than anyone else, you have more to lose, do not stand by and be a spectator. Get involved and later you will not have the guilt of "I wish I had done something". A most important issue to face would be finding a support group that you feel safe with and trust. You cannot do this alone, enlist the help of as many people that you can. Contact your congressperson, senator and your local VFW, AMVETS, DAV or American Legion. This is only a suggestion for what to do. I have compiled this list and information as a suggested guide for personal empowerment.

  

Thank you for listening and God bless,

 

Scott Lee

 

Editor's note: Scott Lee has an excellent blog, PTSD: A Soldier's Perspective, linked here, where he talks about his own experiences as a Gulf War combat veteran with PTSD, and his reflections as a student of social work, attempting to learn what he needs to learn, in order to help other combat veterans with their suffering.  Go, Scott!

Shinseki for VA Head: A Good Choice?

The national news media since Sunday has been abuzz with the news of the appointment of General Eric K. Shinseki (RET) to head the Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) in the Obama administration.  But despite the many positive things I've read about Shinseki and his appointment, I have yet to really get a clear impression of WHY he will be great for veterans.  He IS one; that's a good thing.  And he's a wounded veteran (another good thing).  And one who stood up to the powers that be and seems to have integrity, a good head for strategy, and a reluctance to showboat and hog the spotlight.  Great.  All good things.

But what I haven't read is anything compelling about Shinseki's concern for veterans and their families. Just who he is as a person and how he estimated troop strength better than others.  The Dept. of Veterans Affairs is so obviously the main conduit for delivering health care and benefits to veterans and their families, I'm a little nonplussed as to why he was the perfect choice for that, say, versus a Patty Murray (D-WA), a Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), or a Max Cleland (who headed the VA successfully in the Carter Administration and beyond).  All three (and probably others) were strong candidates: Was Shinseki that much stronger? He's very reserved (not necessarily a bad thing, but...it means we don't know much about what he really thinks about various issues relating to veterans and their care.)

Don't forget the Abraham Lincoln quote, enshrined as the motto of the VA, that says in part:

"let us strive on to finish the work we are in,
to bind up the nation’s wounds,
to care for him who shall have borne the battle
and for his widow, and his orphan..."

When I think about the VA, I wonder who in particular can stay on message with THAT mission.  Will Shinseki be able to?  Let's hope so. It's vitally important that someone does...

Again -- great if it turns out he does a great job, and really cares for veterans and their families, and their significant plight and peril.  But otherwise, why not someone who's already got a track record caring for veterans?  Sometimes it's hard to understand how and why these decisions get made.  Seems like we need Shinseki's leadership in the Pentagon more than in the VA.  But ideally he will turn out to be a great appointee, if we can further define what would make a great appointee.  Someone who makes sure that veterans get the care they need; that their families are included in the process; and that strides are made to both simplify the process and to reach out to deliver health care to veterans in outlying, rural areas.  Maybe Shinseki's strategic side will help here.  We certainly hope so.  Fingers tentatively crossed, but without the gushing that seems to be abounding these days re: this particular appointment...The need is just so great, and it's not going to go away, but rather, continue to grow.

---

Editor's note: There's also this great quote, allegedly from another fave former president, George Washington, which Friend of Veterans Kathie Costos uses as her email signature:

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation." -- George Washington. 

Just another reason why leading the VA is such an important charge...

Army General and PTSD: The Courage to Admit All is Not Well

In honor of Veterans' Day -- hey, every day should be Veterans Day, but we're not so lucky -- there's an important story to let people know about, because it so stands out from the crowd, in more ways than one.

In the wake of a recent apparent suicide by a top military officer, Air Force Brigadier General Thomas Tinsley, from unknown causes, this general's admission about his personal struggle with PTSD is all that much amazing. 

"Officers just don't get PTSD," one combat-hardened Vietnam-era veteran told me recently, knowing full well that it's not so much that they don't get PTSD, but that there's no real way to admit that they struggle with it.

---

An Associated Press report from the weekend talks about Army Maj. Gen. David Blackledge's courage to come forward, after returning from Iraq, and getting psychiatric help to deal with the trauma of war.  As the article says, by doing so, Blackledge is (fortunately) "defying the military's culture of silnece on the subject of mental health problems and treatment."

Says Blackledge, quoted in the article, "It's part of our profession ... nobody wants to admit that they've got a weakness in this area," Blackledge said of mental health problems among troops returning from America's two wars. "I have dealt with it. I'm dealing with it now," said Blackledge, who came home with post-traumatic stress. "We need to be able to talk about it."

The article focuses on the perceived "stigma" in the military culture about admitting there is a problem, seeking help and getting treated -- as well as indications that some positive change is afoot in this area.  Blackledge, who served in Civil Affairs in Iraq, and now works at the Pentagon, is clearly leading by example.  He was involved in several traumatic incidents in Iraq -- his convoy was ambushed, his driver was killed, and he was in a hotel that was bombed by suicide bombers -- and he's successfully sought help dealing with the incidents, help which he believes has strengthened him.

Given that we all pretty much know the statistics of how few people seek treatment vs. the ones who should, as well as how pervasive the culture of silence and fear of retribution is, it's GREAT to see Maj. Gen. Blackledge's openness -- and on this Veterans' Day, we can only hope it encourages many other servicemembers to go for help. The article is linked here. (Thanks to veteran John M. for the heads up!)

Editor's note: That's Maj. Gen. Blackledge 2nd from left in the photo, standing just to the right of Bob Dole, in this picture from a charity fundraiser for the Jericho Project.

Helping Military Families Cope and Heal from Stressors of Deployment and Combat

(From a press release)

Helping Military Families Help Themselves

For a civilian, it’s hard to fathom the stress a military family faces when a parent or spouse is sent to combat zones. Long and often multiple wartime deployments take a toll not only on the service member on the front lines but on family members back at home. According to recent figures released by the RAND Corporation, one in five veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars may suffer from psychological health problems, which can add the strain on military family members.

Now, a program initiated at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and supported by the U.S. Navy’s Bureau of Medicine and Surgery is reaching out to military families to help prevent the personal and family problems such stress can bring. Project FOCUS (Families OverComing Under Stress) is now being rolled out to nine military bases across the nation and in Okinawa, Japan.

“There is increasing awareness that military families, especially the children, can be significantly affected when a parent is deployed, and there is even greater psychological wear and tear when there are multiple deployments,” says Patricia Lester, MD, an assistant professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at UCLA and the director of the FOCUS program. “The spouse left behind is suddenly thrust into the role of being a single parent; routines are interrupted; the children may not understand where their mom or dad has gone; and the service member on the front lines is constantly worried about how their family is doing back home.”

The FOCUS program provides parents and children with customized training that will address the impact of wartime deployment on families and helps them learn very specific communication and problem-solving skills to address these challenges. In addition, FOCUS trainers will provide outreach to groups within military communities to raise awareness about the kinds of pressures families face and to let them know help is available to cope with deployment.

“We build resiliency,” Lester says. “It’s a three-pronged approach to restore a psychological balance to the family, promote future resiliency, and increase knowledge and understanding among the military family culture.”

Families meet with counselors in multiple sessions. Some of the sessions are only with the parents, some are only with the children, and the rest are family sessions. Each session focuses on helping family members identify and share their concerns and fears about a spouse or parent being deployed to a war zone. In separate sessions with parents and children, FOCUS trainers teach them skills to help manage their emotions, solve problems within the family, set goals, and communicate with one another.

“If there are five family members, there’s a good chance that there are five different stories of what that most recent deployment experience was like,” Lester says. “Family members often don’t want to ‘burden’ each other with their personal problems, but in these exceptional circumstances of long-term separations, building a shared family narrative can be very helpful in reestablishing a close family identity and building its strength.”

— Source: University of California, Los Angeles, Health Sciences

The Vietnam Veteran as Exile: Missing in America, But Hidden in Plain Sight

My friend the veteran artist John Paul Hornbeck made this flag -- I just love it.  It carries forward the whole issue of POW/MIA into the present day, by asking in effect why the veteran is "still" Missing in America (that's the "MIA" part these days.)  He mocked up this flag, using the old and familiar symbol, to highlight the cause of homeless veterans in America -- a cause worth addressing.

I'm broadening the point, though, to something else:

Why ARE Vietnam veterans, in particular, still exiles in their own land?

And what should we, as a country, be doing about that?

Because failing to address that, failing to welcome back these warriors into their own land, perpetuating their exile both from what they've seen/done/experienced and how they were received when they returned -- has left a gigantic, gaping gash in the "fabric" of the American psyche; and decades worth of not addressing it has not resulted in any pain being healed.  Sure there are sporadic attempts made here and there, but they're relatively weak, lackluster, or involve too few people to really make a difference.

If you read Pat's "Welcome Home" story, or Claude Anshin Thomas', just to use the names of two representative Vietnam vets among thousands -- you find out that they are STRIKINGLY similar, almost verbatim copies of each other (and the rest who haven't written them, I suppose).  The hopes, the dreams, the flat-out fantasies (under the circumstances) of how they were to be received -- combined with the completely dashed, rejected and really shattered realities of how they were -- aie, the mind boggles.  It's surprising the whole generation of warriors didn't go postal, not just a few.  It also explains why so many of them are still living in pain to this day.  Turned into exiles by what they lived, that they had no possible means of integrating -- and shunned by the country they fought for.  If that woudn't give you issues, I'm not sure what would.

---

So let's think outside the box on this, FAR outside the box.  (If the box is the status quo, that is, because that's not particularly impressive.)  What prevents us from giving veterans, in every city across America, down EVERY Main Street -- a true, genuine, and long-overdue "WELCOME HOME"?!

Couldn't we use that psychic energy we'd gain back as a nation -- from repairing the rent in our actual psyche -- to surge forward, and embrace our combat veterans from here on out, with all the services and the help they so desperately need?  We've seen the problem: it's been well-documented.  But even to go forward successfully, in this case, I think we also need to go backwards -- make use of the "invisible bridge" -- and welcome the group of veterans who are STILL waiting, 40 years out, for America to acknowledge their return.

---

I learned a long time ago, that even in personal relationships, there's a big difference between the crappy/weak/self-serving apology -- "sorry IF I hurt your feelings" -- and an actual, gut-level, authentic and genuine apology, that takes responsibility, asks for forgiveness from the injured party, waits for the answer, or renegotiates the situation -- and then moves on, healed.  In the Bible, that's even called the difference between "worldly sorrow" (sorry I got caught) and "godly sorrow" (sorry that I did it, because I know it was wrong).  Without making a point about religion here, I'm merely trying to show that many traditions understand there's a difference between a heartfelt apology, a lame one, and none at all.  It's like the Oliver Wendell Holmes line from a few blog posts back, that "even a dog knows the difference between being kicked, and being tripped over."

---

Let's harness or leverage the momentum from the current groundswell of public "enthusiasm" for veterans' rights, exemplified by support for passage of the new GI bill, and the continuing emphasis on not settling for less in healthcare, particularly PTSD and TBI.  Let's expand that, though, to other issues of concern to veterans, before the "mood" passes -- as it surely will -- to be eclipsed by other different, pressing concerns.  Let's settle our largely unspoken national shame with how we treated Vietnam veterans, while a few of them are still alive to appreciate that our apology is genuine, and acceptance would heal us all to be able to move forward.  What we don't want to do is to create two different classes of veterans: the ones we care about, who get the right treatments for the right reasons; and the ones we don't, because we frankly made such a mess of it it's just easier to overlook it than apologize and move on.  It's time to make things right for ALL veterans.  Let's have those Welcome Home parades NOW...

Editor's note: John Paul Hornbeck is the artist (and veteran) who made "Shattered Soldier," the lifesize scultpture of a veteran with PTSD, that we blogged about earlier, here.  He is the child of an American Vietnam war veteran Army father, and a Vietnamese mother.