Periodically we come across great quotes (and poetry) that serve to illuminate the human condition in combat. One is the Augustine of Hippo quote we learned about from Nate Fick, which we blogged about here, in 2006:
"Anyone who looks with anguish on evils so great must acknowledge the tragedy of it all; and if anyone experiences them without anguish, his condition is even more tragic, since he remains serene by losing his humanity." -- Augustine of Hippo. From One Bullet Away: The Making of a Marine Officer, by Nathaniel Fick.
Another one is the great Tim O'Brien one, which Jonathan Shay, M.D., Ph.D. wrote about here:
"As Vietnam combat veteran Tim O'Brien wrote in his novel, The Things They Carried: 'A true war story is never moral. It does not instruct, nor encourage virtue, nor suggest models of proper human behavior, nor restrain men from doing the things men have always done. If a story seems moral, do not believe it. If at the end of a war story you feel uplifted, or if you feel that some small bit of rectitude has been salvaged from the larger waste, then you have been made the victim of a very old and terrible lie. There is no rectitude whatsoever. There is no virtue. As a first rule of thumb, therefore, you can tell a true war story by its absolute and uncompromising allegiance to obscenity and evil ... You can tell a true war story if it embarrasses you. If you don't care for obscenity, you don't care for the truth; if you don't care for the truth, watch how you vote. Send guys to war, they come home talking dirty'." -- Achilles in Vietnam, by Jonathan Shay, M.D., Ph.D.
Do you see where this is going yet? If a war story isn't brutal, isn't ugly, it isn't true. People do unspeakable things to each other in combat; and the way they survive is focusing on how to get through (the band of brothers, for whom they fight -- the wet bond of blood -- fighting for the one who stands at your shoulder); and numbing themselves out so that they can keep going on, putting one foot in front of the other, but feeling ... nothing... that they can manage to feel at the time, because there simply isn't psychic space, isn't room. If they feel at all, that will come later. But not during. God help the ones who feel, during. They're likely to not even be able to go on.
To put this another way, they focus on what they can control (almost nothing, literally) -- like being there for the guy or gal next to them; not what they can't control (everything else, including why they're there, whether the mission now or ever did make sense, whether they'll survive, whether they'll ever see home again.) By putting one foot in front of the other, by continuing to stand shoulder to shoulder, somehow, they make it through, often, just barely, and are left -- usually alone, I might add, and it's shameful that this is the case, these people we ask to fight -- to deal with the repercussions themselves, when they simply aren't capable of integrating such a great (as in mighty), all-encompassing, horrific, and horrifically graphic experience on their own. Imagine trying to put these pieces together, yourself. You simply could not; or you'd be the ridiculously rare and most likley superhuman individual if you could. That's just not a realistic (or fair) expectation at all; so let's dispense with it, and get on with the business at hand: understanding what they actually went through, and developing some compassion -- fellow feeling -- for it.
As you read Pat's reminiscences -- the series of accounts of this young Marine, 17, in Vietnam, which I'm titling "eyewitness to combat" -- think about these things.
Remember what Ernie Pyle, the greatest and significantly most humane American war correspondent called it? "The Powerful Fraternalism of the Ghastly Brotherhood of War."