Books of Therapeutic Interest

Amazon Preview


Readability Level

Statcounter HCT


Google Item

My Photo

See Your IP Address

The Military

July 03, 2008

Find the Cost of Freedom, Buried in the Ground

Censored Truth It's an old Crosby, Stills & Nash song, by Steven Stills. Many of us who were there in the 70s still remember the words. I know I can recite them from memory: "Find the cost of freedom, buried in the ground. Mother Earth will swallow you; lay your burdens down."

Tomorrow is the Fourth of July.  Not only my favorite holiday the whole year through -- sorry, I'm a New Englander, we're just born that way -- but also another opportunity - along with Memorial Day, and Veterans Day - to stop and honor the service of those who sacrificed their lives for freedom, or at least, responded to what they saw as the call of duty that they responded to, while others did not. Those whose blood was shed on American soil -- in Lexington, Massachusetts, in the Revolutionary War -- and also, more recently, in the jungles of Vietnam, in the mountains of Afghanistan and in the sands and urban jungles of Iraq.

I'm thinking today about censorship -- and the power of an image to convey, in a single instance, what those of us who labor over our words perhaps never can.  The picture, they claim, is worth 1,000 words -- perhaps because it communicates, in an instant, across barriers of language, space and time -- what human beings instinctively understand, nonverbally.  With war: that there is a price; that it is never really glorious; that those who give their lives often do so -- as the poet W.H. Auden wrote about the famous art masterpiece, the "Fall of Icarus," by the Dutch painter, Brueghel -- in a depressingly inglorious context:

"About suffering they were never wrong,

The Old Masters; how well they understood

Its human position; how it takes place

While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along...

If you don't remember the Greek myth of Icarus you might need some refreshing.  He's the pre-Wright Brothers son of Daedalus, whose father built him a pair of wings, in order to take flight and escape from the island of Crete.  But the father glued the wing feathers in with wax, and then warned his son not to fly too close to the sun (probably without explaining actually why.)  Icarus partially succeeded in his goal -- he was able to fly, but in flying, did get too close to the sun -- at which point the sun's rays melted the wing feathers' wax and he literally dropped out of the sky, into the ocean -- having succeeded in his fabulous quest and also painfully failed, all at the same time.  That's not the parallel with the armed forces: the parallel worth drawing here is that sometimes death on a glorious "mission" turns out to be a most pedestrian thing, and the rest of us, unless we're apprised of it, don't even notice or celebrate.  On a deeper level, it brings up the question: as Americans, how exactly do we "support the troops," if we're not even really aware of what they're up against?

Unlike Vietnam, where grainy black and white news footage of U.S. soldiers fighting and dying in foreign jungles was often watched during dinner, with Walter Cronkite narrating -- in Iraq and Afghanistan, we're reduced to very little coverage and certainly not much that could "upset" our "overly tender sensibilities."  No flag-draped coffins being offloaded at Dover Air Force Base, instantly communicating that for every loss in combat there's a grieving, distraught family and a hole in the community, left by that veteran, that will never be filled.  Even those, like me, who don't exactly excel at math -- we're more than dimly aware that for every servicemember KIA -- or killed in action -- there are scores more wounded and disfigured for life -- emotionally scarred (invisibly) as well as visibly.  The human costs are staggering: those are daddies and mommies, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, employees and employers who come home different: maybe unable to work, maybe unable to function - initially or long-term; maybe unable to take care of their families while they struggle with their own wounds of war.  This is the human cost of war: it exists whether we are personally dialed in to it and aware of it, or not.  It is, to use the words of Hedley Peach, a "generic effect of combat."

And while the news media gives scant coverage to what is happening in the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, as surely as the hands of our clock tick daily the minutes and the hours, somebody's sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, fathers, and mothers are dying, and being injured -- somewhere.  We can be for or against the wars -- forget that noise for now -- but at the very least, we ought to be for the veterans.  And their families.  If what happens is fully what they signed up for: so be it.  I'll say this for myself, if no one else: They're better people than I am.  If it's not what they bargained for: even more reason to feel compassion for what they're going through.  But here's a pretty elementary principle: if we don't see it, we can't grasp it -- and we move on with our lives as though nothing were really happening.  No coffins at Dover? No bodies on the news?  I guess this war isn't really costing that much in human terms after all...it's just another blip on our radar, hardly making a difference among the rest of the pronounced concerns of our lives and welfare.  Except that it IS happening -- and men and women are dying, and being injured, often grievously -- and we're, generally speaking, like the villagers in the Icarus poem, above (read the whole thing) pretty unaware of how that affects us, or if it even does.

And THAT is where journalism comes in, and photojournalism -- to convey in a single image, what dozens of column inches can barely touch.  A single image that resourcefully, potently conveys the reality of life and death on the knife edge, on the tip of the spear -- somewhere around the globe, and challenges you, me, us -- the viewer -- to say that it matters, and that we finally understand.

Maybe that's why in every craptastic Third World-ish revolution, they always kill -- um, that would be the military who does the killing -- the intelligentsia -- the artists, the poets, the thinkers, the intellectuals -- first.  Because I guess if you even goad the populace at large to think, why, you're a highly dangerous individual, and should be stopped -- before you can do any more harm (I mean, good.)

---

Want a riveting image, that "stops the presses," and conveys for all time the intrinsic truth -- or at least, one powerful truth -- about an experience?  Turn to a photojournalist.  I've read more words than I can think of in my time, but if you want to know what I remember -- it's the images, often Pulitzer Prize-winning, from the eras of our shared experience.  Vietnam? It's the naked young girl, covered in Napalm, running from her burning village.  (We dropped the Napalm, btw...) Famine in Africa?  It's the buzzard, waiting for the tiny dark baby with its protruding ribs to just "hurry up and die, wouldja?!" so the buzzard could eat it.  (The photographer who shot that amazing scene, and won a Pulitzer Prize for it, later killed himself -- perhaps because those who witness tremendous suffering, also suffer tremendously themselves.)

---

I'm not going to say who it is, because -- call me a fatalist -- I don't want to wake up tomorrow and find out that he's dead.  ESPECIALLY not on the Fourth of July -- that would be offensive in the extreme.  But the other day, some well-known and ridiculously good photojournalist blogrolled me -- stuck a link to this blog on his blog -- and I checked it out, to see what his stuff was like -- and of course it was riveting.  He's an embedded photojournalist in Iraq, or was, I should say, until the Marine brass apparently got fed up with him, and summarily pulled him out of his embedded assignment and out of the country.  His only offense, from the sounds of things?  Shooting the aftermath of a suicide blast in Ramadi -- you know, the Anbar province -- the Sunni triangle -- the previous hotbed of violence in Iraq -- which if we're to read the mainstream media, why, all that has calmed down considerably from a few years ago, and there's hardly anything brewing there at all.  Well, except for the lives of scores of people who died there, INCLUDING MARINES, in a suicide bombing just last week.  This guy documented it -- as sensitively as one could, given the horrific nature of the scene -- and he expressed the emotional toll it was taking on him, as no other experience had.  And somebody in the Marine Corps upper echelons took offense at what the rest of us call -- oh, I don't know -- the First Amendment -- and took steps to pull him out of there, on the double.

Let's HOPE the guy lives long enough to evacuate safely.  Really.  And then let's hope he still gets to show what he shot, at great personal cost -- because some of the rest of us (it's a refresher course: we're called Americans) want to actually SEE the cost of freedom -- in a way that those of us who don't serve, don't know; and those of us who do, and did -- know only too well.  It's only fair.  If we sanitize the living daylights out of these wars -- for what? -- not only will the American public not "get" the tremendous price paid by those serving AND their families; they won't be as compassionate to the same people afterwards as they need to be.  It's in all of our best interests to actively fight for, and preserve, the freedom of the press.  And that means photojournalists, who document war's horror, sufferings, and triumphs in a way no print journalist could ever begin to approximate.

---

For my part, when I saw the photos in question the other day, I had myself a good, therapeutic, and instantaneous cry -- not just for the crumpled bodies of THOSE Marines on the ground -- he was subtle, nuanced and concerned enough not to show their faces, or anything else that identified them -- but for all the others I knew and knew about, who'd fought, been injured, or died there -- or returned home, not quite as intact, in body or soul, as when they'd left.  To deny us, as Americans, the chance through images like this to share the plight of those who are fighting on our behalf elsewhere in the world, is to deny us the chance to share what servicemembers are going through; and to deny them the chance to know that somewhere out there are people who "get," admire and respect the tremendous price they've paid through their service.

---

The Marine Corps, which wants to sign more patriotic young sons and daughters up to fight, apparently thinks that by constraining the version of what reality is to just a portion of the whole will keep them happy and us in the dark, and people like this brave guy, the photographer, well, in complete limbo.  Little do they know that the patriots will still fight, but the rest of us could use an education course in compassion, sensitivity and yes, tenderness for those who've fought in battle, that only comes through expanding our horizons, and by facing the whole truth of what they're really going through, as combatants. Don't sugar coat the truth: everyone who goes to war comes back changed -- that's just how it is.  Let's develop a compassion and an understanding for what they go through, not sweep it under the rug.  The death and injury of those with whom they serve is often the most scarring aspect of combat there is.  Just ask those who've never been the same since.

So especially on this Fourth of July, as one extraordinarily talented photojournalist sits in limbo, let's hope still alive, ripped out of the fight for no other reason than that he was getting a little too close to home in showing us what war is really like -- I'm appalled to think that as Americans, we're not being trusted with the whole truth, when it's expressly the whole truth that we need, as Martin Luther King once said, to set us free.  We need to know the human costs of these battles we're in.  And suppressing the images of that just harms our servicemembers and their families, and cripples the compassion of us as a people.

---

Until I looked it up just now, I didn't realize that Crosby, Stills and Nash song had other lyrics.  Apparently it does.  Besides the chorus (above), which I remember so well, there's another verse as well:

Daylight again, following me to bed
I think about a hundred years ago, how my fathers bled
I think I see a valley, covered with bones in blue
All the brave soldiers that cannot get older been askin' after you
Hear the past a callin', from Armegeddon's side
When everyone's talkin' and no one is listenin', how can we
decide?

On the behalf of all those "brave soldiers that cannot get older," could we at least not suppress and crush the efforts of those who are trying to get us to see the whole truth?  What truth is that, you may ask?  The very cost of freedom, buried in the ground -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and in Vietnam beforehand. Godspeed, Z.  You are a witness on ALL of our behalf, to the price that war really exacts, on those who serve in it.

June 24, 2008

Needless Trauma: What Vietnam Vets Still Don't Know about Their Service Could Hurt Them

Official_photo_of_Mike_Thompson_lowresSaw this recent press release from a California congressman, who himself is a decorated Vietnam vet, and wondered about the pain that comes from NOT knowing the full extent of what you've been exposed to, as you were serving your country.  For the particulars, keep on reading:

– Today (June 12), Congressman Mike Thompson (D-CA) took another step toward helping veterans who were unknowingly tested with chemical and biological weapons in the 1960s and 70s.

The House Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs held a hearing on a Thompson-authored bill that would give these veterans health benefits and compensation for illnesses resulting from “Project 112” weapons tests. Thompson hopes this hearing will ultimately push his bill toward consideration by the House.

Project 112, which included ship-based Project SHAD, was conducted between 1963 and 1973 by the Department of Defense (DoD) and other federal agencies. The DoD now admits that during these projects, unknowing military personnel were involved a number of chemical weapon tests such as VX nerve gas and Sarin nerve gas and were exposed to biological weapons such as E. Coli, Tularemia (Rabbit Fever) and Q fever.

“First the government denied the tests existed. Then they said the tests happened but were harmless. Now they admit dangerous substances were used on our military personnel, yet they still refuse to give them care for their illnesses,” said Thompson. “We can’t change the past, but we can begin to right this wrong by giving these men the proper healthcare and compensation they earned.”

HR 5954, introduced by Thompson and Congressman Denny Rehberg (R-MT) in May, provides veterans of Project 112 a “Presumption of Service Connection.” This means the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) presumes the relationship between service and a health condition, making the veterans involved eligible for medical benefits and/or compensation for their conditions. For example, veterans exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War are already given a “Presumption of Service Connection.”

“I understand security classifications and the sensitivity of our operation,” said Jack B. Alderson, a retired Lt. Commander from the U.S. Navy Reserves and resident of Thompson’s district. “However, these were not volunteers but service personnel ordered to do a dangerous job and they did it, and did it well, now their nation needs to take care of them.”

In 1964, Alderson was the officer in charge of five U.S. Army light tug boats that were used to test chemical and biological weapons. The tug boats acted as sampling stations and targets for disseminated weapon clouds.

After the DoD admitted to Thompson that the tests did exist and included harmful agents, they released more than 6,000 names of military personnel used in the tests. However, the GAO reported in February that the DoD had halted their efforts to disclose additional names and many veterans remain unaware that they were even involved. The Thompson-Rehberg legislation would require the DoD to hand over all the names to the VA, which must then notify the veterans.

The Thompson-Rehberg legislation has been endorsed by the Vietnam Veterans of America, Veterans of Foreign Wars, American Legion, Disabled American Veterans and Paralyzed Veterans of America.

###


CONTACT: Anne Warden at (202) 225-3311, (703) 338-4480 and anne.warden@mail.house.gov.

For a link to Congressman Thompson's office, click here.

June 13, 2008

The Double Whammy: Women Combat Veterans with PTSD and Military Sexual Trauma

CIMG0819 What's blowing up right now -- on the Web -- in terms of searches, within combat trauma and PTSD: definitely this one. People, the VA included, are looking for resources on treating women combat veterans who are victims of Military Sexual Trauma (MST) (see our index to entries discussing that, linked here). 

That means one of two things (prediction coming): either there's a scandal brewing, and about to hit the news, on this topic; or, the VA and others are fairly well bereft of resources and wondering how best to treat sufferers of this problem, who are apparently reaching the VA in greater numbers.  (One possibility: news items like this that show studies recently have shown an unsurprising but nevertheless unfair disparity in care between men and women veterans.)

Unfortunately, this is another case where civilians have a better situation going for them than the troops do.  In the civilian world, women can take their employers to court for providing a sexual harrassing or otherwise hostile work environment, and their victories in this arena put other employers on notice not to go and do likewise.  Sadly, the troops have no such protection.  It's completely a double whammy: combat trauma AND trauma from rape or other sexual crime.  Women servicemembers who've been affected by it say that in their minds, predominantly, the military sexual trauma is even worse than the PTSD, though they often occur together. 

It's clear we don't have a handle yet on treating PTSD; unfortunately, PTSD concerns even more people; and MST is probably further down the list of where resources are focused right now.  But whether through growing public awareness, better reporting, or for whatever reason, if searches are any indication, the VA is in a quandary about how best to treat MST, and even who the experts / what the resources are.  We wish them, and particularly those who have been injured and mistreated in this manner, all the best, and hope the situation resolves positively, and quickly, for our women veterans, who have been doubly injured.

PTSD, Puppies and Misplaced Values - We're Having the Wrong Conversation, America

Uncle-sam-support-troops__oPt Now that media coverage of SSgt. Travis Twiggs -- the five times-deployed Marine and gen-u-ine American hero who killed himself recently after a protracted and unsuccessful fight with PTSD -- has safely faded from view, America can go back to talking about what really interests it - like the Marine tossing the puppy off the cliff in Hawaii.  Here's a great quotable quote from Kathie Costos, a senior chaplain with the International Federation of Chaplains and a longtime, tireless advocate for veterans with PTSD, both personally and professionally on her blog, WoundedTimes, linked here.  After noting that a mention of the news update on "that jerk" with the puppy toss sent blog traffic sky-high, Costos said, most quotably -- "I hate the fact a puppy toss gets more attention than a Marine killing himself because the DOD and the VA won't do what they are supposed to do."  Amen, sistah.  (I don't believe that she's talking about the Twiggs case there, specifically, but just in general.)

---

On this blog here, other than news about Travis Twiggs, which people were searching for because they cared about him, what really sends the hit meter aflying is any mention of THTIOKARR -- The Hotness That is Otherwise Known as Rudy Reyes -- who I mention from time to time only because, other than the obvious (hotness!!!), he seems to be an interesting amalgamation of "yin" and "yang" -- the reflective, centered, holistically-minded, nevertheless deadly warrior.  (Sort of the Bruce Lee Lite for our generation, or if Bruce Lee were a veteran, that sort of thing.)  That gives me hope that he's processing his own stuff, whatever that may be, from combat in as effective a way as possible, and being somewhat of a guiding light to others who have shared his experience.  On the other hand, I'm pretty sure people are just searching for photos of Rudy Reyes -- and where they're coming from is often fairly entertaining (defense installations everywhere, and multiple foreign countries, as well as our own.)  I enjoy learning news about Rudy Reyes, however faint, as much as the next person; or cringe over more news about the deranged puppy-tosser, but here's some veterans news we actually SHOULD care about, and it's happening NOW, and it affects us all:

From Brian McGough, at VoteVets, quoting Anne Weismann, general counsel for Citizens for Reponsibility and Ethics in Washington [CREW], in a blog entry linked here:

Today, [Citizens for Responsiblity and Ethics in Washington] CREW received a truly remarkable response from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to its Freedom of Information (FOIA) request for documents relating to the VA’s abhorrent practice of under-diagnosing PTSD in veterans to save money. According to the VA, CREW is not entitled to a fee waiver -- meaning it has to pay for the costs of finding and copying responsive documents -- because there is no longer any public interest in this issue! Ignoring the wealth of news articles triggered by CREW’s and VoteVets.org's release of an internal VA email and the congressional hearing that release prompted, the VA claims that any records CREWAmericaisatthemall-thumb requests “would not reveal anything new.”

(Those VA emails are at the heart of a Federal court case in San Francisco, put on by two veterans' rights groups suing the government over better care.  The judge in the case certainly seems to think they're relevant -- perhaps there are more, and that's why the requests were spurned.  Hey, can they even DO that?  They shouldn't be able to...)

But those don't seem to be the topics we're "alarmed" about -- how PTSD from combat trauma can be so bad it can kill you, and how the healthcare system in place to tend to veterans when they come back needs to do a better job of fully taking care of them.  No, instead we're searching for what amounts to celebutainment, and leaving the weightier matters -- for whom? If not us, who? It better be us, and all of us -- there isn't actually anyone else but us who oughta be caring, and who it concerns.  You don't have to actually put on combat boots to "get" that veterans are being underserved, particularly in the area of healthcare (TBI, PTSD, MST) and benefits (foreclosures! the GI Bill), and that it's up to us to care enough about it, that we do something about it, as a nation.  We CAN do that.  Otherwise, the note scrawled on the white board in the photograph, above, in Iraq, is really going to be our epitaph.  America isn't at war -- we're at the mall.

Editor's Note: Sign the petition for the new GI Bill, here. Love the slogan: "We sent them to war.  Why can't we send them to college?"  Why, indeed.

June 11, 2008

Israeli Military's Proactive Plan for Identifying and Treating Soldiers Who Have PTSD

Here in the U.S., in our usual myopic way, we can get bogged down in the news about returning servicemembers with combat trauma and PTSD and forget just how many other countries in the world have struggled with this problem as well, and often found their own solutions.  Internationally, Japan, Israel, Australia, England and Canada frequently search the Internet for news about who's doing what, and what's working, for treating PTSD worldwide -- according to data from Google's analytical trends.  Today, the Jerusalem Post has an article about how Israel's Defense Ministry is about to unveil a plan for evaluating and treating soldiers systematically who have been exposed to PTSD as part of their military service.  (The article in question is linked here.)  Their expectation is that 2,500 Israelis suffer from PTSD, in a country where military service is compulsory, and conflicts in the region frequently boil over into sustained violence. 

The significance of the Israeli announcement is that the soldiers will be treated according to a "set psychological and medical format," meaning systematically and methodically.  Their understanding is that PTSD treatment succeeds better if initiated earlier, so evaluating all soldiers soon after military service will increase the chances of favorable treatment outcomes.  According to the article, three years ago the military started thinking through how to create a protocol that would involve every soldier, and optimize chances of finding and treating PTSD.  The protocol was developed by Zeev Waisman and Dr. Dan Dolfin.

Two interesting comments from the article express a vision that the U.S. might be wise to emulate:

"A soldier who comes out of battle will immediately be evaluated and we will see what type of treatment he needs," Waisman said. "Nothing is done today in a regulated fashion and we want all treatment to be according to a protocol."

The process begins by inserting the soldier's profile into the system which will then offer several courses for treatment that could include medicines, psychological therapy, family therapy, sex therapy and others. Waisman said that the Ministry of Defense hoped to convince other organizations to adopt the new format which will be evaluated in two years.

Stateside, it's not even clear that the various branches of the Armed Forces share a similar protocol for identifying and treating PTSD -- most likely, they do not.  With far more servicemembers at risk for PTSD than the Israelis have, we could do worse than to imitate what the Israeli Defense Ministry is putting into action as a plan to deal with PTSD, and return exposed servicemembers to better mental and emotional health.

June 10, 2008

"Give an Hour" Helps Fill Veterans Counseling Gap

Hourglass Give an Hour -- the foundation that matches member psychogists and counselors with veterans and their families in need of counseling at no charge -- to fill the currently unmet gap in mental health services, has been in the news recently.  (You can learn more about Give an Hour's founder, Barbara V. Romberg, Ph.D., in her bio, linked here). It's truly fantastic to see this public-spirited act of service on the part of Give an Hour; at the same time, it's a shame that private industry, so to speak, has to jump in to fill the unmet gap of mental health care -- the need for which care is an entirely predictable "soft cost" of going to war.  Nevertheless, good stuff, and very altruistic and forward-thinking on the part of Dr. Romberg and her organization.

From a press release:

The American Psychiatric Foundation, Lilly Foundation And Give An Hour Join Forces To Provide Mental Health Care To Iraq And Afghanistan Veterans

Heeding the call of a growing public health crisis -- the unmet mental health needs of returning soldiers and their families -- Give an Hour (GAH) and the American Psychiatric Foundation (APF) announced a major expansion of a nationwide effort to help U.S. veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

GAH and APF, the philanthropic and educational arm of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), will be using a $1 million grant from the Lilly Foundation to recruit and educate volunteer mental health professionals, who will become part of a network aiming to bridge the gap in mental health services for soldiers returning from service, as well as their families. Among troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, approximately 40 percent of soldiers, a third of Marines, and half of the National Guard members report psychological problems, but mental health services are in short supply.

"This all-volunteer effort provides badly needed support to help our veterans, many of whom come home with mental health needs," said U.S. Representative Steve Buyer (R-Indiana), Ranking Member, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. "I applaud the hard work of Give an Hour, the American Psychiatric Foundation, and the Lilly Foundation, which are stepping up to help those who have selflessly served."

Efforts will be made to create a large, national, volunteer network over the next three years to address postwar mental health issues such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), drug abuse, anxiety and depression.

"This grant will allow us to get out the message that help is available. We want to normalize what our military personnel and their families are experiencing and support the sacrifices that they are making by providing critical mental health support at no cost," said Barbara V. Romberg, Ph.D., founder and president of GAH. "We will be educating the military community and broader public about these mental health needs in hope of helping veterans keep their lives and families intact."

GAH is recruiting mental health professionals to volunteer one hour each week for a minimum of one year to provide direct services in person, by phone or in consultation with schools and community organizations that serve the military community. Services are wide-ranging and include marital and family therapy, substance abuse counseling and treatment for PTSD. APF brings strong ties to the psychiatric community and is actively encouraging psychiatrists to join the network.

"This grant will help us reach our goal of recruiting 10 percent of the 400,000 mental health professionals in the United States by 2015 to assist in this effort," said Dr. Richard K. Harding, M.D., president of the APF. "It is an ambitious goal, but we are confident it can be achieved."

The Department of Defense (DoD) is making an unprecedented attempt to encourage personnel to seek mental health treatment, but a significant increase in demand, in some areas, has forced the rationing of services, created long waiting lists and limited individual counseling sessions. In addition, some members of military families such as parents, siblings and unmarried partners do not qualify for care through the Veterans Administration or DoD but are affected nonetheless by the mental health of the veteran.

"We're privileged to be able to give something back to our troops, but we know there's still much more to be done," said Steven Paul, M.D., executive vice president for science and technology and president of Lilly Research Laboratories. "Lilly is fully committed to assuring that the best possible medicinal treatments are available, but unfortunately, we also know that having access to the best care -- in this case mental health services -- is essential."

About Give an Hour
Give an Hour is a nonprofit 501(c)(3), founded in September 2005 by Dr. Barbara V. Romberg, a psychologist in the Washington, D.C., area. The organization's mission is to develop national networks of volunteers capable of responding to both acute and chronic conditions that arise within our society. Currently, GAH is dedicated to meeting the mental health needs of the troops and families affected by the ongoing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Give an Hour now has approximately 1,200 providers across the nation and continues to recruit volunteer mental health professionals to its network. For more information or to volunteer to become part of the effort, please visit http://www.giveanhour.org.

About The American Psychiatric Foundation
The American Psychiatric Foundation is the charitable and educational subsidiary of the American Psychiatric Association. The mission of the foundation is to advance understanding that mental illnesses are real and can be effectively treated. For more information, please visit the foundation's web site at http://www.psychfoundation.org.

About Lilly
Lilly, a leading innovation-driven corporation, is developing a growing portfolio of first-in-class and best-in-class pharmaceutical products by applying the latest research from its own worldwide laboratories and from collaborations with eminent scientific organizations. Headquartered in Indianapolis, Ind., Lilly provides answers -- through medicines and information -- for some of the world's most urgent medical needs. Additional information about Lilly is available at http://www.lilly.com.

From Give an Hour's website:

Our Mission
Our mission is to develop national networks of volunteers capable of responding to both acute and chronic conditions that arise within our society. Our first target population is the U.S. troops and families who are being affected by the current military conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. Give an Hour is asking mental health professionals nationwide to literally give an hour of their time each week to provide free mental health services to military personnel and their families. Research will guide the development of additional services needed by the military community, and appropriate networks will be created to respond to those needs. Individuals who receive services will be given the opportunity to give an hour back in their own community.

Our Focus
Our organization is currently focusing on the psychological needs of military personnel and their families because of the significant human cost of the current conflicts. Over 1.6 million troops have been deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Persian Gulf since September 11, 2001. Nearly 550,000 of these troops have been deployed more than once. According to the U.S. Department of Defense, as of May 15, 2008, nearly 4,600 American troops have died in Iraq and Afghanistan. Roughly 32,875 U.S. troops have been injured during these conflicts.

In addition to the physical injuries sustained, countless servicemen and servicewomen have experienced psychological symptoms directly related to their deployment. According to a RAND report released in April 2008, over 18 percent of troops who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan--nearly 300,000 troops--have symptoms of post-traumatic stress or major depression. At the same time, about 19 percent of service members reported that they experienced a possible traumatic brain injury. And let us not forget: millions of Americans belong to the families of these servicemen and servicewomen. Spouses, children, parents, siblings, and unmarried partners of military personnel are all being adversely affected by the stress and strain of the current military campaign.

Our military leaders are well aware of the human cost of this campaign. Indeed, they are attempting to address the psychological needs of the troops through a variety of programs within the military culture. Unfortunately, the tremendous number of people affected makes it impossible for the military to respond adequately to the mental health needs in its greater community. For example, according to the RAND study, only 43 percent of troops reported ever being evaluated by a physician for their head injuries. Moreover, returning combat veterans suffering from depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are not routinely seeking the mental health treatment they need. RAND also reports that only 53 percent of service members with PTSD or depression sought help over the past year.

A major barrier preventing military personnel from seeking appropriate treatment is the perception of stigma associated with treatment. Many fear that seeking mental health services will jeopardize their career or standing. Others are reluctant to expose their vulnerabilities to providers who are often military personnel themselves, given the military culture’s emphasis on strength, confidence, and bravery. Servicemen and servicewomen might be more inclined to seek help if they know that the services provided are completely independent of the military. By providing services that are separate from the military establishment, we offer an essential option for men and women who might otherwise fail to seek or receive appropriate services.

We are also offering services to parents, siblings, and unmarried partners who are not entitled to receive mental health benefits through the military. Although these individuals may have access to mental health services through other means, they are less likely to seek the help they need and deserve if that help is difficult to find or costly. Our goal is to provide easy access to skilled professionals for all of the people affected by the current war. The participating mental health professionals offer a wide range of services including individual, marital, and family therapy; substance abuse counseling; treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder; and counseling for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Whether it is a young military wife who is anxious because her four-year-old has had nightmares since her husband’s deployment or a father who is struggling to cope with his son's loss of a leg as a result of an explosion in Iraq, both will receive the assistance they need to move through their experience. The healthier the support system for the returning troops, the lower the risk of severe or prolonged dysfunction with